What is the bid submission deadline? In Section II.2.13. it is 15th August and in IV.2. it is 16th August?
What is the bid submission deadline? In Section II.2.13. it is 15th August and in IV.2. it is 16th August?
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.” What is the weight of Technical Proposal &
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.”
What is the weight of Technical Proposal – 80% or 70%?
It appears that there is a mistake in the formula above. Should the formula above be: S=Stx70% + 30%xSf?
Is there any indication of the number of the man-month input budgeted for this project? Does the remuneration include only retainer or is there a success free envisaged as well?
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.” What is the weight of Technical Proposal – 80% or
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.”
What is the weight of Technical Proposal – 80% or 70%?
It appears that there is a mistake in the formula above. Should the formula above be: S=Stx70% + 30%xSf?
Is there any indication of the number of the man-month input budgeted for this project? Does the remuneration include only retainer or is there a success free envisaged as well?
In the Section II.2.3. HPP Zhur, Required Investments, you mention that “development of the HPP Zhur shall be completed with private investments”. Is the Government of Kosovo planning to participate in financing of the future building of the HPP Zhur? Is that a reason for requiring the transaction advisor to have experience in str
In the Section II.2.3. HPP Zhur, Required Investments, you mention that “development of the HPP Zhur shall be completed with private investments”. Is the Government of Kosovo planning to participate in financing of the future building of the HPP Zhur? Is that a reason for requiring the transaction advisor to have experience in structuring financing of similar project?
In the Section II.2.3. HPP Zhur, Required Investments, you mention that “development of the HPP Zhur shall be completed with private investments”. Is the Government of Kosovo planning to participate in financing of the future building of the HPP Zhur? Is that a reason for requiring the transaction advisor to have experience in structuring
In the Section II.2.3. HPP Zhur, Required Investments, you mention that “development of the HPP Zhur shall be completed with private investments”. Is the Government of Kosovo planning to participate in financing of the future building of the HPP Zhur? Is that a reason for requiring the transaction advisor to have experience in structuring financing of similar project?
In the introduction (II.2.1.) you say that the purpose of the project is “provision of transaction advisory services”. In the Section II.2.10. You list the requirements for the Consultant, including “track record of structuring and financing complex infrastructure projects“. Are we right to assume that you do not
In the introduction (II.2.1.) you say that the purpose of the project is “provision of transaction advisory services”. In the Section II.2.10. You list the requirements for the Consultant, including “track record of structuring and financing complex infrastructure projects“. Are we right to assume that you do not expect the transaction advisor to have experience with financing such projects but rather in advising on structuring the financing of such projects?
In the introduction (II.2.1.) you say that the purpose of the project is “provision of transaction advisory services”. In the Section II.2.10. You list the requirements for the Consultant, including “track record of structuring and financing complex infrastructure projects“. Are we right to assume that you do not expect the tran
In the introduction (II.2.1.) you say that the purpose of the project is “provision of transaction advisory services”. In the Section II.2.10. You list the requirements for the Consultant, including “track record of structuring and financing complex infrastructure projects“. Are we right to assume that you do not expect the transaction advisor to have experience with financing such projects but rather in advising on structuring the financing of such projects?
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.”
What is the weight of Technical Proposal – 80
In the Section II.2.11. you specify that: “Sf = 100 x Fm / F, in which Sf is the financial score, Fm is the lowest price and F the price of the proposal under consideration. The weights given to the Technical and Financial Proposals are: T = 0.8, and P = 0.2; S = St x 70% x 30% + SF.”
What is the weight of Technical Proposal – 80% or 70%?
It appears that there is a mistake in the formula above. Should the formula above be: S=Stx70% + 30%xSf?
Is there any indication of the number of the man-month input budgeted for this project? Does the remuneration include only retainer or is there a success free envisaged as well?
MEM supports improvements in energy efficiency
Prishtina, 19 May 2010 - Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM) along with GTZ (German Technical Cooperation Agency), has organized an informative seminar on the benefits of energy efficiency measures, as part of the National Efficient Lighting Campaign.
Kosovo has a modern legal framework on the energy sector
Dear organizers,Dear colleagues,Dear Ambassadors, and other participants, Firstly, please allow me to thank the organizers for organizing for their hospitality and for creating a very a suitable environment to discuss on such important topics, such as the energy security of supply.